College athletes are paid
Pay for Play: Should College Athletes Be Compensated?
Grinding through grueling workouts, practices, and games every day of the year, combined with rigorous college courses, student-athletes are some of the hardest working people in the country.
However, as amateurs, athletes cannot be compensated with more than one scholarship. College football has become a multi-million dollar business. Universities continue to make money while all athletes receive a scholarship. The biggest problem with this is that the cost of attending college exceeds the amount athletes receive in their scholarships.
With many athletes from poor families, athletes are pressured by agents, alumni, and fans to pay compensation for their hard work. This is illegal under the current rules. This begs the question, should college athletes receive a scholarship from universities as compensation for participating in sports?
There are two main arguments made by those who oppose paying athletes., First, it is widely believed that university sports departments would accumulate debt by playing athletes.
If schools added a $ 100 per week scholarship for every 200 athletes scholarship, it would cost $ 800,000 per year. Basically, the smaller, less profitable programs the athletes could not afford without other budget cuts.
It's a valid argument because programs can't afford to lose money at the end of the year. In all fairness, programs would need to find another source of income to pay the athletes.,
Since some schools would be forced to pay less money or not pay at all due to a small budget, it would seriously affect their chances of signing better athletes. There is the potential that paying athletes could make college competition worse.
A scenario similar to the NBA where many of the most talented players might flock to selected teams. Given that recruitment is already highly competitive, other benefits could upset the balance of power across the country.
The other main argument is that this would encourage corruption and injustice., There would have to be very strict laws on how much athletes could be paid, but schools could find ways. It is already possible, albeit extremely illegal, to pay players for colleges.
If it were legalized, many believe that it would only increase corruption. As for injustice, many argue that it would be difficult to establish a pay scale for all athletes.
Since it is really only the football and occasionally basketball teams that make the profit for the university, it would be extremely difficult to pay other athletes the same. Al Dunning explained it best, “Softball outfielder women earn the same salary as they do Quarterbacks? "
Guess what the courts will do if the softball team's lawyers take this question to court. So Homestate Tech has to pay the same wages for all 200 scholarship holders. Anything else would be unfair and probably illegal. This relates directly to the starting point that costs would add up quickly. If they didn't, there would be an uproar. Either way, the universities would be in financial need.,
However, there is a wide range of people who support the athletes who are being paid to say that athletes are often exploited and deserve more compensation. Some argue that they get free education, but many of the athletes, especially on the basketball and soccer team, make a large amount of money on school and spend much of their college life training.
And while they do receive a full scholarship, there are costs that are not included in the scholarship., The scholarship covers most expenses, but some have estimated that the actual cost of living is $ 1,500 more than what it covers. Since most will never exercise professionally, they actually accumulate debt in school.
Another important factor is that many of the athletes come from poor backgrounds. To offend the injury, it is illegal to do a job during the year. This creates a situation where athletes face a dilemma between taking money and accumulating debt.
Two prime examples of this are AJ Green and Terrelle Pryor., Both players sold memorabilia for relatively little money. Green missed the first four games of the 2010 season, and Pryor will miss the first five games of the next year. Both come from poor backgrounds. Both bring a lot of money to their respective universities and yet were desperate for money.
While this has very little impact on universities, it often leads to violations and criminal offenses., In Allen Sack's summary of the situation, he stated, “The NCAA has developed a payment system that provides a relatively cheap and steady supply of blue chip athletes in college sports and gives coaches the kind of control over them that employers have over employees ... a survey of college athletes showed ... that they identify more as athletes than as students. "
And at the end of the day, although "student athletes" and their universities claim to be educated first, athletes mostly care about their sport., Many athletes don't go to school or graduate, so much of the scholarship is for them is useless. You shouldn't be forced to accumulate debt in school while making schools profit. Since they are essentially workers, they should be paid as such.
As an athlete who has trained and played with many current college athletes, I can relate to the effort that it takes to be a college athlete. My former quarterback is currently at the University of Delaware. When he talked about his college experience, his first word was soccer and his second sentence was time consuming.
Every day he has to wake up early to exercise and then go to class. After class, practice and study Halle consume its evenings. It's an “all work, no play” lifestyle. Because I know what it takes to be a college athlete, I believe college athletes should be compensated.
A small monthly scholarship enough to cover basic expenses is enough to cut athletes' expenses., To expect too much to play athletes for an education and the love of the game is too much. Every year the issue of paid athletes is growing in popularity, so it is time to offset it before more illegal money is being taken.
In order to satisfy all parties included in the “pay for play” scenario, negotiations would have to be conducted. The first would have to agree that this is the case. There will be no additional incentives or pay increases.
Second, a pay scale needs to be developed that will allow universities to remain profitable and keep athletes out of debt., Strict laws also need to be put in place to prevent corruption. Ultimately, all athletes and universities must agree to grant some of their current benefits.
- Can I run FIFA 17?
- Is the Islamic religion sexist
- How would minarchist libertarians reform social security?
- Commercial students can do a BSC Nursing
- What are the types of micro-irrigation
- Are there no confrontational narcissists
- How many calories is the impossible burger
- Why are China and India densely populated
- How do you balance chakras
- Indians obey traffic rules
- Why do wine glasses have stems
- Why do we have a solar system
- Which Batman movie is the worst
- What is the Pharmacy Council of India
- What does a closed complaint mean
- Why is the usability of Fedoras getting worse and worse
- When is intensely viewed as attractive
- Which reports are available in ERP
- What site offers JN0 647 exam dumps
- Are organic bases water-soluble
- Why do people create drugs
- How do I start selenium
- Does the magnetic field affect the temperature
- What are the alpine meadows