Should Trump's cabinet be all politicians

In the past few days, Donald Trump looked like he was enjoying everything very much. The future President of the United States was sitting high up in his Trump Tower and the world was at his feet. On Twitter, he let the share prices of companies crash, once alienated China because he was on the phone with Taiwan, and conducted employee interviews for his cabinet. "Perhaps for the first time he will feel all his power," was the latest in the New York Times.

Every day he called out the individual candidates, many men and a few women who got into the elevator past the crowd of journalists. As in the election campaign, Trump dictated all reporting, spread rumors, and ate with Mitt Romney, whom he once considered as foreign minister, in a gourmet restaurant so that everyone could see it. The whole production was reminiscent of the reality television with which Donald Trump grew up: Instead of roses like the Bachelor to his wives, the President-elect distributed cabinet positions. Once he said, "Nobody knows who my new defense minister will be. Just me." He sounded like the host of his own show.

A well-known columnist calls Trump's selection process "ignorant and inconsiderate"

His cabinet is now almost complete and the most important posts have been taken. And it is noticeable that in many cases he has chosen candidates who have no experience as politicians and in some cases have liked to criticize politics in Washington in general. It's not surprising. During the election campaign, Trump had promised to pull the wrecking ball through Washington and to break up encrusted structures. It will now be seen what emerges from the rubble.

"Maybe this is a good way to start over," speculated columnist Thomas L. Friedman, speaking of a touch of anarchy surrounding Trump's nominations. It could make perfect sense to elect a foreign minister who knows more about deals than diplomacy. But putting Scott Pruitt at the helm of the environmental agency, someone who expresses doubts about climate change and would like to get rid of the agency he is leading, is just "ignorant and inconsiderate," Friedman said, and "extremely dangerous." .

Pruitt is by no means the only despiser of the agency he is supposed to lead, or at least a fundamental critic of its previous work. The stated goal of the new Minister of Health Tom Price, for example, is to replace Obamacare. The outgoing president's health reform is unsuccessful and unaffordable. "There are far too many government regulations in the health system," says Price and announces that he will want to "clean up" everything.

The future education minister Betsy DeVos has long criticized the public school system and wants to enable parents to send their children from state schools to private institutions through tax breaks. Labor minister-designate Andrew F. Puzder comes from the fast food industry and has little love for unions; he doesn't believe in raising the minimum wage to $ 15. Ben Carson should also be mentioned in this series, who competed against Donald Trump in the primary campaign and is now, as a former brain surgeon, to head the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development. Carson wants to push the state back from as many areas of social coexistence as possible. He describes the public sector's fight against poverty as a "disaster".

It's common in America for a new presidency to come with big changes. One of the country's strengths lies in the will to complete renewal. Barack Obama came to the White House as a young senator who, like Trump today, spoke of change. But unlike Obama, who always sought and appealed to the advice of experienced political opponents, Trump has turned his back on the experts and elites. "The number of cabinet members who question the purpose of the authorities they lead is unique in the history of the country," said Neera Tanden, president of the liberal think tanks Center for American Progress. She assumes that there will be enormous tensions within the ministries between the long-term employees and their new bosses. Climate specialists from the EPA have announced that they will not work with their new boss, climate skeptic Scott Pruitt.

It is striking how many in Trump's future cabinet had great success not only as business people and amassed billions or at least millions. They also apparently have in common the assessment that politics cannot be an overly difficult undertaking. After their careers in the free market economy, they probably think it easy to succeed in the public sector too.

"They have no idea about the concerns of the middle class."

Trump's election of Rex Tillerson, head of the energy giant Exxon, as foreign minister is only logical: Trump thinks little of political experience. Mitt Romney, whom Trump praised as a serious contender for the office days ago, was never really considered by him, it is now in the US media. Trump only wanted to show him off as revenge for Romney criticizing him in the election campaign. We don't know whether that's true. But many trust Trump.

Mitt Romney would have fit into Trump's cabinet. He's white and manly, like most, but above all he's filthy rich. The family fortune of Betsy DeVos, for example, the future Minister of Education, is loud Forbes $ 5.1 billion. Trade Secretary Wilbur Ross is also a billionaire. "Team Trump is made up of the super-rich who have no idea about the concerns of the middle class," Senator Bernie Sanders said in an interview. Then there are bankers from Wall Street and, in Generals James Mattis (Defense) and John Kelly (Homeland Security), men from the military who have lived much of their lives in "another world" than the average American.

Extreme wealth is not an obstacle to doing a good job in the public sector, says Sanders. But Trump built his candidacy on standing up for the "little man". "But maybe that was the biggest lie in an election campaign marked by lies and power games." White, male, rich and the majority without political experience: Donald Trump has created a cabinet in his own image.